Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Between (fictional place)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus non-notable Nosebagbear (talk) 23:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Between (fictional place)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Dragons (Pern)#Psychic abilities and add this entry to the dab page Between. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:56, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, delete per below. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:32, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Extreme, niche fancruft. I doubt that the redirect target suggested above will survive much longer, too. AMC books are notable in light of WP:NBOOK, but her characters and related concepts are much less so. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Usual-variety fancruft. Fails GNG/NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 12:34, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable enough for a seperate article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:44, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this inevitably unsourced piece of original work, possibly made by fans. Wikipedia is not a depository of random infornation. -The Gnome (talk) 13:37, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable and fails GNG. and WP:V. Niche term without reliable sources. Wm335td (talk) 21:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.