Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharya Swantham Suhruthu
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Bharya Swantham Suhruthu
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bharya Swantham Suhruthu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Two references are dead, the rest fail to demonstrate notability. Kolma8 (talk) 17:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 13:12, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 18:08, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 18:08, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - does have reviews in sify.com, India Glitz etc. but no nationally-known critics Spiderone 15:23, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nationally known means in well known national publications but while Sify is a reliable source, India Glitz is not, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 01:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.