Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhurjee (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:13, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bhurjee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish which part of WP:NOTABILITY this might meet. Boleyn (talk) 08:48, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:50, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:50, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no indications of notability, basically no content at all. Cavarrone 11:15, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above - No evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 20:13, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Pinging those who have commented on its notability before: Ramgarhia Munda, Sitush, Green Cardamom, Dharmadhyaksha. Boleyn (talk) 20:41, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm responding to Boleyn's ping, so make of that what you wish but I stand by my preference and rationale for deletion that was presented in the previous discussion. I've not spotted anything since that would make me change my mind. - Sitush (talk) 22:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.