Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhutan–Brazil relations (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:52, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bhutan–Brazil relations

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. This is trying to make notable relations about a relation with a tiny Asian country. no embassies or agreements. The common memberships prove nothing about actual relations. the level of trade is very low, even the article admits "In 2011, Bhutan ranked 236th among Brazil's trade partners, having a 0,00% participation in Brazilian foreign trade". The fact that you have to pass through a third country to fly to Bhutan adds zero to relations. The claim that Brazil is interested in Bhutan's happiness index seems more like the opinion of one person and not the Government LibStar (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 February 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:29, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:13, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:15, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 03:11, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable at all. Wikisaurus (talk) 10:07, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.