Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bi-2 (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 00:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bi-2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Russian band. KDS4444^Talk 15:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep likely as I noticed the Russian Wiki has a detailed article so familiar attention is needed. SwisterTwister talk 22:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. 10 Interwikis -> notable. No new arguments since second nomination. Arved (talk) 09:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep With the aid of Chrome's translation function, we do seem to have enough reliable sources on that Russian wiki article to meet WP:GNG, including claims by some refs that the band would meet WP:CREATIVE as well. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.