Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Floppa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 19:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Big Floppa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV; most of the sources are primary and social media which are... less than desirable. WP:BEFORE gets a grab-bag of transient, internet-meme/factoid sites, nothing that'd show this subject qualifies for an article. SilverTiger12 (talk) 15:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as being a non-notable, GNG failing internet meme.

No reliable source covers the topic significantly. Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 15:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I cannot find any reliable sources covering the cat known as Big Floppa. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 16:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am also unable to find RS. Likely merge to the species article. Invasive Spices (talk) 19:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Internet, and Russia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (wasn't this up for deletion a year ago or so? Apparently not) A pile of Instagram "refs" and a minimal scattering of other unreliable sources. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.