Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Motz and Bob Roth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎. CSD G5 Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:01, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Motz and Bob Roth

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftification, here because WP:DRAFTOBJECT prevents unilateral draftification. This nomination is to draftify by consensus, unless referenced sufficiently to verify notability. Fails WP:V, a key tenet of Wikipedia 🇵🇸🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 07:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and United States of America. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 07:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Illinois and Michigan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify - Notability not established; article has no references. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:44, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I know the nom is to draftify, but I'd actually say delete, because the author has a week to establish notability, and if they can't, then seems somewhat pointless to draftify. However, I can live with draftifying also, as long as the author agrees to put this through AfC. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:40, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At first I thought about draftifying the article as it is plausibly notable per WP:NPRODUCER #3, but then I change my mind to deletion. Even though draftification is an acceptable option per WP:ATD, I do not think that this topic will ever be notable since the only sources I could find are unreliable (interviews, passing mentions, profiles etc.). ToadetteEdit (talk) 15:20, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Deleted per WP:G5 and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rodolfootoya12 Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.