Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Cockcroft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Cockcroft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. Unclear due to lack of citations, but the article appears to have been written using primary sources, and I was unable to locate any additional sources with significant coverage of this person. J Mo 101 (talk) 12:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions. J Mo 101 (talk) 12:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and England. Shellwood (talk) 14:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above reasoning. Mn1548 (talk) 14:07, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.