Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bing Steel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dave Bing#Bing Steel. (non-admin closure) buidhe 23:42, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bing Steel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence of notability DGG ( talk ) 18:44, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. History may be sketchy, but it cites its sources and was also founded by a notable person who also has an article here on WP. 52Tarby (talk) 19:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Dave_Bing#Bing_Steel. "cites its sources" is not a valid reason to keep an article. Reywas92^Talk 02:30, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect: Fails WP:NCORP. Inherited notability is usually not a good argument. See: WP:INHERITORG. Wikipedia is not a directory of business listings. That would be a bad idea. -- Otr500 (talk) 01:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.