Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BioTronics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BioTronics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A directory-like listing for an unremarkable company; significant RS coverage not found. What comes up are passing mentions or PR-driven -- insufficient to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:40, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. South Nashua (talk) 19:54, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:05, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nominator, coverage by cited sources is not significant enough to confer notability. SamHolt6 (talk) 20:26, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: the content is so sparse that it hardly makes a credible claim of significance and the sources given show little notability. DrStrauss talk 15:56, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.