Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biocider Enhancer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  22:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Biocider Enhancer

Biocider Enhancer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The term biocider enhancer yields zero external google hits. Leyo 15:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. If kept, rename to "biocide enhancer/enhancement".
While there are some "recipes" in the scientific literature to improve efficiency of biocides, there is not enough to source a standalone article. Maybe a small mention in biocide could be warranted but I failed to find independent sources (articles are WP:MILL examples of "I found that X improves Y"). Note also that current sources are all from the same research group. Tigraan (talk) 12:55, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Tigraan: A small mention has already been added, but I am not really convinced. --Leyo 13:39, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neither am I, and I reverted it. I actually do not think current sourcing is enough for a mention, either. Tigraan (talk) 10:14, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biocider Enhancer, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.