Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BiosGroup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). Of note regarding the first !vote following the nomination, while it's highly desirable for articles to be sufficiently sourced, as per WP:NRVE, topic notability is not based upon the state of sourcing in articles, it's based upon the availability of reliable sources that provide significant coverage of a topic. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BiosGroup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not seem to meet the GNG or NCORP. A Google search brings up social media, press releases, and trivial mentions. Guerillero | Parlez Moi 06:32, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. As written, the article has no sources that suggest this company is notable. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:51, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 14:24, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep for now. It looks like there's more than it meets the eye. A quick search threw up USA Today, one journal, another journal and even a Nature article. Might be a good idea to run it through Google Scholar to be sure. - Mailer Diablo 22:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.