Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bisarva News

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted and salted. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bisarva News

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This self-published news outlet doesn't seem to be notable, and has been speedied per CSD A7 a few times already. To settle the debate once and for all, and to avoid re-creation, I thought I'd bring it here for discussion this time. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt - although they do get points for the "Genuine Reporting" notice on the site. —Мандичка^YO 😜 10:15, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as Hoax Their "official website" is a wordpress blog with one article from 2014 on it. There is nothing that gives the indication that this actually exists except for some very questionable lists. Winner 42 Talk to me! 17:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt for six months and I suggest any interested creators use Articles for Creation until the salt ends. My searches found nothing to suggest this blog is notable. SwisterTwister talk 23:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt indefinitely: fails WP:GNG and unlikely to be notable, so salt idefinitely. Esquivalience ^t 00:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.