Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bismil Azimabadi (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sreeram Dilak (talk) 00:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bismil Azimabadi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails WP:POET and WP:AUTHOR. No reliable sources found on a WP:BEFORE. Sreeram Dilak (talk) 10:29, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sreeram Dilak (talk) 10:29, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Sreeram Dilak (talk) 10:29, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sreeram Dilak (talk) 10:29, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. He is a notable Urdu poet. Sarfaroshi Ki Tamanna are his words and therefore he fulfils all the points at WP:POET. The article could do with some attention. Whispyhistory (talk) 20:40, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable Urdu poet and Indian Independence movement activist with many reliable newspaper and book references. Ngrewal1 (talk) 23:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A notable Urdu poet with his biography Bismil Azimabadi: Shakhsiyat awr Fan (Bismil Azimabadi: Life and art) authored by Muhammad Iqbal. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 18:01, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Gazal world Can you help us with more sources that discuss Bismil? Thanks. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 18:06, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Let me check. --Gazal world (talk) 18:40, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep certainly notable. I am sure, numbers of offline sources would be avilable in library. --Gazal world (talk) 18:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.