Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bizbell Academy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bizbell Academy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, can't find significant discussion in multiple reliable sources. The organization's own web site doesn't work. ... discospinster _talk 19:11, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 19:18, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: probably a tuition academy. Doesn't qualify for WP:NHS. --lTopGunl (talk) 20:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:44, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 03:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete With the putative organization's Facebook page having given way to spam, I think it is unlikely that further sources, which would be necessary to demonstrate notability, will be forthcoming. --j⚛e decker ^talk 20:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.