Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blaze PR
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 06:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Blaze PR
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Blaze PR (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails WP:NCORP. Sources are generally non-reliable and not intellectually independent. Others fails to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. Beyond that, the article is pretty purely advertising, and may be suitable for an appropriate speedy. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:15, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Jmertel23 (talk) 13:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. References fail WP:NCORP and the article fails WP:SPIP. HighKing++ 17:37, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete absolute WP:CORPSPAM Chetsford (talk) 23:41, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.