Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blind Foundation for India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Manu K. Vora. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades ^Godric 04:43, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blind Foundation for India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage per WP:ORG. SL93 (talk) 02:54, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:11, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:11, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete per nom. Found nothing on Google News. --Elton-Rodrigues 16:09, 7 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elton-Rodrigues (talk • contribs)
  • speedy delete isn't just a delete done quickly - there are particular scenarios when it applies, and the nominator did not name any of them. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 07:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge/Redirect to Manu K. Vora, founder of the organization (the article mentions it already). Doesn't look like enough to satisfy WP:ORGDEPTH for a stand-alone article. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 07:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• SL93, Rhododendrites and Elton-Rodrigues, would these sources change your minds: News India Times, India Post, WBEZ-FM, India West, one book. About WP:ORG... I think WP:GNG triumphs it. However, GNG isn't absolute, so other parts of WP:N would help, wouldn't they? --George Ho (talk) 14:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• @George Ho: Having now taken the time to look at these sources, it looks like three of them are based on the same press release ([1] [2] [3]). WBEZ does cover it, but it's an interview with Vora, which speaks more to his notability than the organization's and reinforces my opinion that it should be merged. Finally, the book is published by iUniverse (i.e. self-published). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.