Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blindsinabox
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 18:13, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Blindsinabox
- Blindsinabox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable product. TheLongTone (talk) 15:03, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 15:55, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- delete fails NCORP by miles. Jytdog (talk) 18:51, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:ORG and is obviously created with promotional intent. Being a contrender in this kind of reality show is absolutely not a reason for a Wikipedia article. I was actually in the process of tagging this A7+G11 when there was an edit conflict with the creation of this AfD. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:30, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:ORG. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.