Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blistermud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted‎ by Ponyo (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) as "G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban: Mass deletion of pages added by GRAPN MAN". This applies to both articles. (non-admin closure) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blistermud (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. WP:SIGCOV is lacking, WP:NMUSIC isn't met.

Also nominating the band's album article for the same reason.

Anything For Nothing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Frost 18:55, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Michigan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:56, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.