Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blockshopper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to LocalLabs. Sandstein 09:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blockshopper

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost all sources that talk about this website simply talk about how it violates privacy and enables stalkers. Doesn't otherwise state notability. JTtheOG (talk) 18:13, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete by all means as there's not even anything to suggest minimally better notability here. SwisterTwister talk 03:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is no evidence of WP:N or WP:COMPANY being met.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:38, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to LocalLabs, its parent corporation, as Blockshopper does not appear to have adequate notability. If it were notable, its claim to notability would be its surprisingly amoral business practices. It is also possible that LocalLabs is not notable, but that question is for another time. --Bejnar (talk) 19:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.