Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Chip Cookies
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:29, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- Blue Chip Cookies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. It is written by someone with a conflict of interests, and although there is some coverage, it seems to not add up to notability. Boleyn (talk) 15:46, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:51, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:51, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:51, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:CORP[1][2]. Most of the promotion has been stubbed. (does anyone have access to that Highbeam article so we can take a closer look?) CorporateM (Talk) 02:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Keep – Meets WP:CORPDEPTH, albeit on the weak side. Sources found include [3], [4], [5], [6]. North America1000 06:04, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 08:28, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 08:28, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per sources above as well as these [7][8][9][10], Sources aren't perfect but they're better than nothing. –Davey2010Talk 21:45, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.