Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bluehand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:57, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bluehand

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources used given in this article are all primary. In my brief search I could not find anything that would signal notability. Sjrct (talk) 18:38, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Seems the subject is notable but lacks coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 18:46, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as non-notable. All sources are WP:PRIMARY/WP:SELFPUB. --Drm310 (talk) 19:38, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as A7; "organization that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant", no indication that it's anything more than a group of Twitter users. Not seeing any press coverage. I've cut the interpretative and WP:BLPSPS claims which were sourced only to single Twitter posts. --McGeddon (talk) 08:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No RS, no notability. I agree that A7 also applies, but perhaps better to let this run its course so that next time this is created, we can simply G4 it. --Randykitty (talk) 12:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As not being notable at all, with no references in any independent sources. Also comments like "...to combat the racism, Islamophobia and Anti Semitism of the #Bluehand group." are utterly not neutral at all. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:16, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No reliable sources and fails notability. -- Dane2007 ^talk 19:04, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.