Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bluffer's Media Limited

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:HEY (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 11:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bluffer's Media Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, sources are almost entirely primary sources (interviews with writers) or book reviews (some of which are 90% copied from the books themselves). Primefac (talk) 20:40, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:20, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:20, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:20, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Tiny non-notable publishing house. Curiously the series of books are (I imagine) notable: A better outcome would be to redirect to an article on the series. If there was one, which there isn't.TheLongTone (talk) 16:12, 3 March 2015 (UTC)Changing to Keep in view of changed title of article.TheLongTone (talk) 11:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename to Bluffer's Guides per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. Goodrich, Terry Lee (1991-12-14). "'Bluffer's Guides' in time for holiday parties". Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Retrieved 2015-03-04.
  The article notes:
2. O'Connell, Loraine. (1991-09-11). "Thin Slices Of Expertise: 'Bluffer's Guides' Offer Just Enough Tongue-in-cheek Information For You To Get By On Without Ever Actually Knowing Anything About He Subject." (pages 1 and 2). Orlando Sentinel. Archived from the original (pages 1 and 2) on 2015-03-04. Retrieved 2015-03-04.
  The article notes:
3. Bonnin, Julie (1991-06-21). "Pure bluff - Backround books are Cliffs Notes for conversationalists". Austin American-Statesman.
  The article notes:
4. Magid, Judy (1991-07-14). "How to fool most people some of the time". The Salt Lake Tribune.
  The article notes:
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Bluffer's Guides to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 00:41, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article rewritten to reframe to discuss the series rather the company. Cunard (talk) 01:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY, thanks to Cunard for locating sources. I added two more news cites, one of which verifies the company's multi-million sales figures. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:24, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.