Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blumenbecker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:16, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blumenbecker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies entirely on self-published sources. Source searches in English and German suggest little that would go towards passing WP:CORPDEPTH. SITH (talk) 12:32, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:50, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:50, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There is no significant independent coverage of this company. Even the German sources are basic listing in the German federal register. Papaursa (talk) 23:49, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nomination, no RS. QueerEcofeminist ^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 18:29, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.