Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Andy pie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Andy pie

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable pie that does not pass WP:GNG, references consist of recipes and trivial mentions. WP:BEFORE check yielded no sources that show WP:SIGCOV. BaduFerreira (talk) 21:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. BaduFerreira (talk) 21:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GQO, could you explain why you don't find the article encyclopedic? Industrial Insect (talk) 18:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not encyclopedic :GQO (talk) 9:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete. It appears to be a real thing - although I've never heard of it, and there are not reliable sources. For cakes and pies, I look for recipes in several reliable sources, such as famous cookbooks and the New York Times. Bearian (talk) 13:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Source case. If eventually there could be WP:ATD, I will say redirect o List of pies, tarts and flans. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.