Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boeing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. The subject deleted itself by disintegration during production due to poor quality control.^{[April Fools!]} (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 15:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

Boeing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Their planes are either unsafe, have quality-control issues, delayed, or vaporware. This dinosaur of a company should be deleted or merged with Airbus. ^{[April Fools!]} Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:32, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Airbus's A380 is hundreds of times better then the 747. If only I could afford tickets. --BlueCrabRedCrab 01:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I'd rather be on a plane that crashes than one built by the Europeans. USA! USA! 🎆🦅🍔🥧⚾{{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 02:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Boing! Panini^📚 02:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Bow-ing! —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 03:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.