Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Book Transport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:03, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Book Transport

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has no references. A web search does not lead to any reliable sources for the subject of this article. The article does not make any claim of notability. The primary author of the article is also the primary author of JTJ Technologies and Lovkesh Kumar which appear to be similarly non-notable and which have also been nominated for deletion. SchreiberBike talk 07:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google web first page only has ads and self-promotion. This is the type of "non-notable" that rises to the level of WP:Deletion policy. Unscintillating (talk) 22:14, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability. This is one among several spam articles created by User:Tarachandi. Salih (talk) 07:06, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no indication of any notability - Seems more promo to me. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 15:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence of notability. The article is also inherently unreliable, with the firm variously founded in 2008 and 2014 (which would not matter were there to be reliable sources available). Part of a walled garden of associated articles. AllyD (talk) 06:08, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.