Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boomer Phillips

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 18:12, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boomer Phillips

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially toned WP:BLP of an actor and comedian, with no strong claim to passing WP:NACTOR and no strong reliable source coverage to support it. The references here are his IMDb profile, a tv.com profile which is not a reliable source for the same reason that IMDb isn't, and his own MySpace page. These are not reliable sources that can support notability, and actors do not get an automatic notability freebie just because roles happen to be listed — to qualify for an article, he needs to be the subject of enough reliable source coverage to verify that he passes an NACTOR criterion. Bearcat (talk) 18:58, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:20, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:13, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - cool that he got to accomplish his dream to be a firefighter but not notable..or sourced. Most of the article isn't sourced, and it's all unnotable. Myspace and imdb are not reliable sources. I can't imagine tv.com is either. Sorry Boomer. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:35, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.