Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boston Interactive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boston Interactive

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is written only for promotional and advertising purposes. Mentioned awards are not credible and won by repeated entity. References are very poor. No significant coverage by independent media. Nothing significant or notable about the company to be here. does not meet notability criteria. Light21 13:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:46, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete blatantly written like a press release, and the WP:REFBOMBing is mostly primary sources and press releases - David Gerard (talk) 15:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Obvious adspam is obvious. Ravenswing 20:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: After research, I can find no WP:RS for this company. Safehaven86 (talk) 16:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROMO and lack or RS. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.