Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boxed (record label)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boxed (record label)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable record label. - TheMagnificentist 15:56, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no confirmed signed artists, issues seem to be mixes. Only sources found were a listing in an advertisement, and discogs. Does not appear to be notable by NMUSIC#5 nor GNG. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- notability not inherited from notable artists; nothing else there otherwise. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:22, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺17:36, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.