Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boxx (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:33, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Boxx

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a minor programming language, apparently two guys' hobby project, recreated after a previous AfD. No sign of use or influence. None of the given references pertain to the topic of this page. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 09:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a speedy deletion criteria, specifically the recreation of a page deleted per a deletion discussion. However, it's 7 years old. The article is mainly just elaborating on the language in itself and the syntax and all that, but has no reliable sources nor good enough references. No notability given. Tutelary (talk) 13:20, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. jonkerz ♠talk 13:22, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. jonkerz ♠talk 13:22, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - According to the history, the article was recreated via "content review" (a process I'm not familiar with) so I'll say speedy doesn't apply, however I can find no evidence of notability whatsoever. Ivanvector (talk) 17:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note - Boxxy is an unrelated article. Ivanvector (talk) 17:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be filled in by Special:Prefixindex, which is added by Twinkle automatically. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 21:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - programming language (software) article of unclear notability. Refs provided do not have clear connection to subject. Several predate the language, Rapid Deployment Software, the only linked ref makes no mention of Boxx; none of the books have page numbers for verification. A search turned up no RS coverage of this language. Dialectric (talk) 02:06, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Dialectric's rationale. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 13:04, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.