Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boxycharm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:20, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boxycharm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure that these sources have enough WP:CORPDEPTH to them. If they aren't a repeated press release about securing more funding, then they are simply featured in 'seven best beauty subscriptions' articles, which indicates some notability, but they are not the exclusive subject of the source. A Google search doesn't come up with with anything convincing either. WP:TOOSOON, I'd say. !dave 19:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 20:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:49, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, as stated above. Trivial, and does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Kierzek (talk) 20:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete ,,, as corporate spam. Hey you, yeah you! (talk) 07:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- not sure why this got relisted. Should have been deleted already: pure corporate spam on a nn subscription service. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete—per nom. NikolaiHo^☎️ 04:11, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:15, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: These reference sources seemed quite like WP:SOAPBOX to me. SA 13 Bro (talk) 19:36, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.