Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgette Andersen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seems to be consensus that the subject meets WP:GNG. ansh666 05:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bridgette Andersen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet general notability; was nominated for awards but did not actually win any. Just one reliable source that only includes a passing mention. That sole source indicates she was 17 when she died which is different from age 21 years given in the article. Please see article talk page for further discussion. SagaciousPhil - Chat 08:09, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 10:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 10:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment partially copied from article talk page to keep conversation in one place There is currently one reference to the Colorado Springs Independent, which probably counts as a reliable source. It is, however, a mere parenthetical sentence fragment that reads: "a year older than Savannah Smiles star Bridgette Andersen, who overdosed on heroin in 1997". Most searches turn up general celebrity sites like IMDB and Find-a-Grave and the like. There are also some biographies on sites of questionable RS status, including Movie Pilot and Daily Hatch. Her WP:GNG notability is questionable. A claim of "...her internet cult following" is not supported by these searches, although it would be a qualifying claim under WP:NACTOR#2. If there is a cult following, then it should be kept and evidence should be added to the article. Otherwise, it should be deleted. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I did a newspaper search and found two three newspaper articles that discuss the subject in-depth. One from 1982 1 and another from 1983 (don't have access to newspapers.com to clip it though) 2. (edit to add a third newspaper article found from 1984 from newspapers.com) 3. A few more passing mentions in newspapers. 45 While the subject didn't have a long career, she did receive more than average attention from the press during her career, along with the passing mentions regarding her sad early demise and meets the GNG in my view. GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 16:54, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgette Andersen, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.