Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Machine Vision Conference

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

British Machine Vision Conference (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing a good reason why this should be considered notable. A lack of good quality third party sources on the page at present, not seeing much else to consider JMWt (talk) 11:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and United Kingdom. JMWt (talk) 11:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I can't find any good non-primary sources for either the British Machine Vision Conference or the British Machine Vision Association. I'm happy to change my vote should either or both shown to be notable. Cortador (talk) 12:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. – dudhhr ^talk_contribs^she_her 17:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:38, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unfortunately Wikipedia's notability standards make it very difficult to write about academic conferences and journals. It requires someone independent of the conference organizers to write in-depth about the conference, and publish their writing reliably in a way that is also independent of the conference, something that rarely happens. We have not turned up sources of this nature in this particular case. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.