Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bro4u

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I will salt--this is hopelessly non-notable at this stage. DGG ( talk ) 20:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bro4u

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete and Salt please given this was speedied once before as both no claims of significance and advertising and this is exactly what it is, note this was even cut a few days ago to at least initiate some improvements, but it's clear, with such blatancy, the only solutions for such advertising is deleting altogether. There's especially the obvious advertising publishing in the sources themselves, not to mention information, and that's exactly what I'm seeing at searches, but that's something expected since all of this was in fact clear company-motivated advertising. SwisterTwister talk 04:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article on a recent start-up firm. The given coverage is predominantly propositional start-up coverage which I think is insufficient to establish encyclopaedic notability. There is also some coverage of their hiring for distribution of their publicity but however commendable, I think that is also insufficient for notability. AllyD (talk) 08:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:04, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:04, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It is TOOSOON for this one year old company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Anup [Talk] 15:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Not notable, promo, and an orphan article --FuzzyGopher (talk) 18:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete and salt: Non notable,promo-like and mere startup coverage.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 08:52, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.