Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buffalo Box

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seems like the consensus is that the underlying concept is notable and worthy of being covered in some fashion - perhaps as part of a larger article, or in another article - even if the name is poorly chosen and the article in its current form inadequate (e.g per Epinoia's argument). Calling this a "keep" with the understanding that it is no prejudice towards merging or renaming the topic, although further discussion would be needed for either. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Buffalo Box (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn't have any extensive coverage, so I think it fails WP:GNG Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:18, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:19, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included at list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:19, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included at WikiProject Home Living. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 00:11, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included at WikiProject Water. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 00:11, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included at WikiProject Civil engineering. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 00:11, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui  07:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for now. Some research led me to a variety of sources ranging in reliability. While this is the case, curb boxes are a covered topic that receives enough attention to keep an article. Clearly this is not within my realm of expertise, but I trust that delegating responsibility to a plumbing WikiProject, if it exists, to patch up the article. This was suggested above, but I personally believe that the topic has enough potential to warrant its own article in this instance. However, a general piping article may be more aptly suited for the task of covering curb boxes if it comes into existence. Until then, this is fine in my eyes. Utopes (talk) 22:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Utopes, do you suggest the article be renamed? Did you find sufficient source to pass WP:GNG? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes to the rename. After looking into it further, I would personally prefer to rename the topic to be Curb Box. I added sources, but they aren't great. There was an old news article, and coverage by MW Dictionary. Will keep searching. The amount of coverage it has from a search seems to prove notability, but it's verifiable, reliable sources that it really lacks. If I could compare it to something, it's like finding sources for an article about a Chair. Everybody knows what it is, but you aren't going to find sources that cover it. That kind of stinks for the "Keep" case, but I'll continue on. Nothing decisive yet. Utopes (talk) 22:34, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Utopes, well the chair article talks about its history too. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 04:45, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    True. I'm just referring to finding reliable sources about chairs. Searching for the word "chair" won't give you anything too great, so "history of the chair" would be the course of action........ wait..... As I was typing this, I realized that I should try more detailed searches, such as "history of the curb box." Already found an actually good source with this new mindset. Utopes (talk) 21:59, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - all this article does is give a definition of the term, but Wikipeidia is not a dictionary WP:NOTDIC - article does not establish why this term is notable - therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 16:56, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:54, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:23, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buffalo Box, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.