Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullet Tooth Records
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted (G12) by Jimfbleak. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Bullet Tooth Records
- Bullet Tooth Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly sourced, highly promotional article about a record company. I am unable to find any reliable sources with which to establish notability per WP:ORG - MrX 21:58, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. Copyvio and close paraphrasing of multiple sources. Intro, Affiance, Dead Icons, Death Ray Vision, First Blood, etc. Current article is also pure promotion. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.