Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burhan Bashir Bhat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  15:32, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Burhan Bashir Bhat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biographical article of 3 year old child who was killed in firing by terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir state of India. Obviously 3 year old child is non-notable, there is article named Human rights abuses in Jammu and Kashmir to add such incidences. So as per WP:SINGLEEVENT, WP:NOTNEWS, article should be deleted. Human3015^TALK  13:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  13:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Provisional Keep this Double murder of father (described as a "former member" of terrorist group Jamiat-ul-MujahideenJamiat-ul-Mujahideen) with child in his arms certainly received substantive [1] national coverage in India. I think it can be kept, but only if the article's author or another editor takes the time to turn it into a better written, NPOV article on this as a double murder, or as one in a series of such murders as described in the Indian press accounts. As presently written, this is POV attempt to use Wikipedia as a political advertisement and should be deleted or merged.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:42, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep if the coverage is sufficient. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep - sufficient coverage....--BabbaQ (talk) 19:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: don't we usually in these cases, where there obviously is not coverage to write a regular bio, default to an article title like "Murder of XX"? Pinging (Human3015—E.M.Gregory—SwisterTwister—BabbaQ). -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:47, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose. SwisterTwister talk 07:50, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think coverage is not enough to rename it to "incidence". Only 4-5 lines can be written on this incidence. It can be part of parent article of Human rights abuse. Such incidences of killings are nearly daily thing in Kashmir. --Human3015^TALK  10:43, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly it should be renamed in a more standard way. There is enough in the major papers for a brief good article on this double murder.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:53, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and rename, sufficient coverage, but I agree with the conversation above. Kharkiv07 (T) 22:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not a WP:SOAPBOX and it's WP:NOTNEWS as the nominator points out, there was WP:SENSATIONal coverage at the time, mentioning Aylan Kurdi, although the two have nothing in common. There is no WP:LASTING impact. Another victim of a long civil war, today big news, tomorrow forgotten. Kraxler (talk) 13:48, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.