Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bustopher Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 02:11, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bustopher Jones

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. Prodded and prod removed. Multiple issues issued already raised in tag at article since March 2015 Richhoncho (talk) 09:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats. Nothing sourced to merge, but a redirect seems reasonable. --Michig (talk) 11:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - There are articles for each of the characters in Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats and Cats (musical): Jennyanydots, Growltiger's Last Stand, Rum Tum Tugger, Old Deuteronomy, Rumpus Cat, Mr. Mistoffelees, Macavity, Gus: The Theatre Cat, Bustopher Jones NS Skimbleshanks. Perhaps these should all be considered for deletion as a group. ~Kvng (talk) 17:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Strong evidence of notability in HighBeam search. ~Kvng (talk) 17:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect instead as only best connected to that, nothing actually convincing to sufficiently improve. SwisterTwister talk 06:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.