Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buzz Chat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per G11 by Deb. (non-admin closure)‎ Shellwood (talk) 09:24, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Buzz Chat

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too early to be on Wikipedia and violates WP:SOAP. Article creator publicly declared COI at his user page and can be identified as app creator himself. I would suggest to have Protection from Creation. iMahesh (talk) 07:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. iMahesh (talk) 07:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete G11, pure marketing. Wikishovel (talk) 07:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see there's a discussion about deleting the Buzz Chat Wikipedia page due to concerns about it being promotional. I'd like to clarify that our intention isn't to promote the app but to provide valuable information to users.

Buzz Chat is an AI-powered Social Networking app that serves a real purpose beyond marketing. It's not just about selling a product but contributing to the technology landscape.

I understand the need to maintain Wikipedia's standards. Still, I believe the page can offer genuinely informative content to readers without being promotional.

Let's work together to ensure the page provides valuable information while adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines.

Thanks for your understanding. Fredabila (talk) 07:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Already speedy deleted as advertising. This fell well within the G11 category. Deb (talk) 08:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How may i retrieve my articles source. I need some info from it Fredabila (talk) 08:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.