Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C-Drone-Defect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:40, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

C-Drone-Defect

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I came across this via an unfinished AfD for the performer's debut album, Neural Dysorder Syndrome. I was just going to redirect the article here, but I noticed a lack of sourcing in the article. A search brings up nothing to show that this performer is notable enough for an article at this point in time.

I'm nominating this and the album for deletion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - I've been able to find a few album reviews for Dystopia: Reflections of Darkness, Brutal Resonance, Soundsphere, Musik Reviews, Chain DLK, Grave Concerns. The first site is an RS, I believe, the second seems borderline, and the rest don't look too good. I'm not willing to push to keep based on that flimsy sourcing. If someone else digs up something better, I might switch to keep. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 22:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone can find good, strong sourcing I'm open to a keep as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete perhaps at best as I would've considered Keep because of the reviews regardless of closely examination but this is still questionable and my searches found nothing better. Draft if needed. SwisterTwister talk 04:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.