Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CEDC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) - TheMagnificentist 09:36, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CEDC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This disambiguation page contains 7 items, of which only 1 has article. However, per WP:Disambiguation, dab pages are meant to deal with potential conflicts between subjects ALREADY covered by Wikipedia , for a given word or phrase that a reader might search. Here, with this acronym and these subjects included, it is not the case. Also, per WP:DABACRONYM , items should not be included unless they are commonly known by this acronym, included in the (not existent here) articles. So, I believe this dab page must be deleted Kostas20142 (talk) 11:58, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All items are allready mentioned in another articles on wikipedia (including abbreviation). Two of them now links to existing article. So I think it shouldn't be deleted.--Qxbase (talk) 09:53, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep now meets requirements, with 2 articles and others which meet MOS:DABRL / MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 15:43, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: now a valid dab page. PamD 16:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.