Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CHI-CHI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, no pejudice against recreation if better sources have been found--Ymblanter (talk) 08:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CHI-CHI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable group that has only released a handful of singles and have since disbanded. Sources are disputed and many rely on Social Media or WP:PRIMARY. Karst (talk) 23:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  09:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  09:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  09:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unnotable Asdklf; (talk) 18:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Not notable. WP:MUSICBIO says one single on any country's charts is enough, but the sources for the article are inadequate. The one RS that I could find in Japanese was this one, about an event at a Tower record store. – Margin1522 (talk) 03:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.