Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CILICANT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 20:18, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CILICANT

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company fails NCORP. There is no significant coverage. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 16:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 16:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 16:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - likely undisclosed paid-for spam. I've blocked the author for this. MER-C 17:11, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep added more reliable references. Passes WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. 171.76.245.252 (talk) 15:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails both WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. I took a look at the references: 1 does not mention CILICANT; 2 as it says, an "advertorial"; 3 "Moneycontrol journalists were not involved in the creation of the article"; 4 "advertorial"; 5 "This is a partnered post"; 6 routine coverage of a funding round; 7 does not mention CILICANT; 8 an interview; 9 "advertorial"; 10 derived from company announcement; 11 derived from company announcement; 12 derived from company announcement.

None of these are suitable and I cannot find anything better. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Malcolmxl5.4meter4 (talk) 18:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.