Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CKHSS Cheppad
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 21:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
CKHSS Cheppad
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CKHSS Cheppad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable school, fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Only source I can find is their own Facebook page, no secondary sources at all. ninety:one 10:10, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ninety:one 10:10, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ninety:one 10:10, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:25, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Pipsally (talk) 11:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete What a horribly written, clearly non-notable article. Such articles should really be speedy deletable. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:32, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- All those suggestions are 'out of scope'. This is what a 'stub' looks like. It is here so we can decide if reliable sources could be found, by a Wikipedian with more experience than the stub creator. Look to WP:ORG as a reason to delete.ClemRutter (talk) 07:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- How is something not being notable out of scope? I have more experience then the stub creator and couldn't find any references that work. Your free to provide some if they are out there instead of just chiding other people for not being able to find any. Adamant1 (talk) 15:23, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- All those suggestions are 'out of scope'. This is what a 'stub' looks like. It is here so we can decide if reliable sources could be found, by a Wikipedian with more experience than the stub creator. Look to WP:ORG as a reason to delete.ClemRutter (talk) 07:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:NOT. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 10:44, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Please feel free to expand your argument. It is a bit short... Geschichte (talk) 06:36, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.