Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COPYTRACK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COPYTRACK

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:SPA article on a company established in 2015, with text describes the company's service proposition. The references are largely primary plus some relating to a research item by the company and some blog posts. While some more recent posts relating to their Initial coin offering and commenting on a Kodak announcement can be found, I am not finding evidence that the company has attained encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 09:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:58, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:58, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- WP:PROMO & fails WP:CORPDEPTH; sources are routine, WP:SPIP, etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:35, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.