Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CTeen (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Chabad. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 13:39, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CTeen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is written like a promotional advertisement. Many of the references are primary and in-house promotion of their programs e.g., suicide prevention, learning of Torah. Nothing to indicate notability outside of Chabad. Whiteguru (talk) 19:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree and think it should be left for a while to see how it develops. It definitely needs more work but there are plenty of reliable sources for the information in this page from mainstream press sources outside Chabad.Londoner77 (talk) 02:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Whiteguru (talk) 19:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Whiteguru (talk) 19:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Whiteguru (talk) 19:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the page in it's present form needs a lot of work, but there are clearly enough general media references to meet the WP:NOTABILITY standard, as well as merit it's own page. I will try and improve the substance and format when I find some time, but meanwhile feel it should stay. Winchester2313 (talk) 18:17, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Chabad. This organization has, at best, marginally significant coverage in independent, reliable source. Most of the sources that are independent or reliable are not significant and vice-versa. Some of the significant coverage is in reliable sources that are part of the same or similar movements, making the independence criterion a bit borderline so "Merge" seems the best outcome per WP:ATD. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.