Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caleb Punzalan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Caleb Punzalan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Infant who appeared in tv show. No other indication of notability. agtx 18:44, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I've got zero results which completely fails GNG. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 20:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no where near enough to justify an article on this infant.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Instaurare (talk) 05:48, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Satisfies WP:GNG. Mentioned in GMA News independent article of actress Lovi Poe and GMA Entertainment Actors Profile. Also mentioned in True Viral News , Lovi Poe's Official IG and also trended nationwide (Philippines) in IG and Twitter to prove the actor's large fan base.

References

CORRECTION to the biased assumption of (User:Agtx) Actor appeared in a TV show is incorrect. Actor advanced as a major cast in a prime time TV soap that is still airing as of press time (four months on air). Actor also appeared in a previous TV soap (Sinungaling Mong Puso).

Your social accounts (User:Callmemirela) should not be part of this discussion as we are debating about a real celebrity whilst you are not. Also, the official accounts of TV channel GMA Network and of Filipino celebrity Lovi Poe were referenced to supplement the fact that the actor has a large following (hence the reference on trending and viral terms).

No need to disparage the actor with your play on words (User:RickinBaltimore) (Cute kid, not notable) as you already intend to delete the actor's page. Remember, babies can't defend themselves. --leetphenom 18:28, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Bearian (talk) 13:41, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cute kid, not notable. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:51, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Official accounts do not make it notable. By that basis, I should have my own Wikipedia article as I have my own Instagram, Facebook, Twitter and Snapchat accounts. A few articles (maybe 2-5 in this case) doesn't make it that more notable either. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 17:24, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:GNG. Jeez articles on babies? Spacecowboy420 (talk) 12:02, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. None of the article references constitute depth of coverage. Cute baby though! A Train^talk 16:31, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even under the reasonable assumption that we'll see more coverage because they keep bringing the personality back because they're good for acting, this is WP:TOOSOON. No objections once this subject passes WP:NACTOR. Being in the scene as a baby does not confer the active participation necessary to consider contributions to the field. Hasteur (talk) 19:58, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Just appearing on a show is not grounds for notability, no active participation. Including infants in Wikipedia is also a big moral issue IMO. EternalNomad (talk) 03:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.