Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Cartee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ambrosiawater (talk) 06:57, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cameron Cartee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG lacks news coverage Okaye Agongo (talk) 08:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Okaye Agongo (talk) 08:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I was evaluating this myself with an eye for deletion as this nomination came in. He has done sound engineering for notable artists and has his won releases (or mixes). However, it does not appears these independent releases have achieved significant success with coverage being mostly non-independent PR. Coverage overall on Cartee himself is lacking in quantity and depth for GNG.--Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 08:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Meets WP:NMUSIC, has produced and mixed recordings for notable artists. Jaysonsands (talk) 09:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  User:Jaysonsands, WP:NMUSIC does not have a stated criteria conferring notability in these circumstances (does not in fact address audio or sound engineers at all) and furthermore it does not supersede WP:GNG which is not met here.--Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 09:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  User:Eostrix He qualifies WP:MUSIC criteria not sure about GNG though. Also digging more deep I see he produced many notable songs like Project E.T. which surely qualifies him for WP:MUSICBIO. Jaysonsands (talk) 09:35, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Being credited as one of the producers or sound engineers does not count towards WP:MUSICBIO as it applies to "bands, singers, rappers, orchestras, DJs, musical theatre groups, instrumentalists" - performers, not producers, audio engineers, promoters, or other production/promotion work. His own songs would qualify, but his own work is not notable (and is less significant than his production work).--Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 09:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, agree with you on some. However, He qualifies WP:MUSIC Criteria #10 Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. Jaysonsands (talk) 10:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Per above, passes WP:MUSIC for his notable work in media and recordings. INeedToFlyForever (talk) 16:32, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notable per WP:MUSICBIO criteria. Zackdasnicker (talk) 09:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per above, passes WP:MUSIC for his notable work in audio engineering and production. Reviewguru (talk) 09:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.