Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Elder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Double A7 (no claim to notability for either the person or the webchannel) and G11 (obviously created to drive traffic to Youtube channel(s)). The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:24, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cameron Elder

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Youtubers are not relevent to wikipedia. The Cosmos Master (talk) 18:23, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. Pretty obviously not notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:59, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No credible assertion of notability. No reliable source coverage found in search. • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - There is no way he is notable for having less than 20,000 subscribers. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 18:36, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.